news

Most teams face a Double Mandate: keep the lights on (BAU) and deliver a massive change portfolio—both non-negotiable. The instinct is to estimate BAU at 20% on average and plan on the remaining 80%. It's a trap. As Sam Savage warns in The Flaw of Averages, a commander who crosses a river of "average depth" 3 feet drowns his troops in the 10-foot hole. The fix: plan with P80 Net Velocity—your "bad day" number, the work you deliver 80% of the time even when things go wrong. Then attack the tax: keep critical BAU, automate high-value BAU, kill low-value BAU. The goal isn't a roadmap that looks green on Day 1—it's one still green on Day 365.

On paper, the matrix is a perfect grid of accountability. In practice, decisions stall, priorities conflict, busy work multiplies while delivery lags. Drawing on Goldratt, Barnard, Christensen, Martin, Ackoff, and Kotter, the diagnosis: the matrix optimizes parts at the expense of the whole and lets leadership avoid hard strategic choices. The antidote isn't better management of the grid—it's radical alignment around a Single Direction of Travel: external, measurable, the only thing that matters. Subordinate everything to it, build a coalition that holds, keep flow visible. Silos don't disappear; they just stop mattering.

The matrix promises flexibility and shared resources. In practice, it's where flow goes to die—no one can make decisions alone, so nothing much changes. One antidote: an archipelago of adaptiveness. Build a substantial team-of-teams that works semi-independently on a real product, using genuinely adaptive ways of working in a permanent island designed to radiate change outward—not get reabsorbed. Volunteers, not assignments. Distributed leadership. Customer-informed learning and flow. Protect it through coopertition, nested PDSA loops, and Avengers-style closed shields against silo pressure. The matrix must evolve. Networks result and thrive.

Predictable delivery doesn't require a crystal ball—it requires a commitment to evidence. Subjective status updates lead to missed targets and shaky forecasts. An evidence-based approach replaces them with objective data: clearer insights, faster decisions, less waste. But dashboards alone aren't enough. The Obeya—Japanese for "big room"—turns data into shared understanding. It integrates KPIs, flow metrics, feedback, and risks into a single source of truth, drives focused discussion at a regular cadence, and converts decisions into tracked, accountable action. The most effective Obeyas are tailored to a specific purpose, with a leadership style to match.

In today’s fast-moving business world, innovation isn’t a luxury—it’s a necessity. But game-changing ideas often don’t come from the boardroom. They come from the people closest to the work. Unleashing Innovation explores how to bridge the gap between those who spot problems and those empowered to solve them. From creating psychological safety to breaking down silos and celebrating experimentation, this guide offers practical steps to cultivate creativity at every level of your organization.

You tried the shortcuts. You realize there is no escalator to success. You want the people around you to be comfortable with you, you to be there for them, and for them to be there for you.

There are no set recipes for how to do things, but we will give you proven ideas, principles, and success patterns to try out and see what works for you. Self-awareness, emergent learning, and adaptation are essential.

You can join one self-contained module, some modules, or the entire series. Some modules cover in-depth topics that others only lightly touch. The content is interconnected yet independent.

Excessive bureaucracy curtails adaptiveness. So does an attitude of keeping promises even when it's learned they were terrible promises. More coherence is needed.

To mitigate the risk of negative consequences, more executives and board members need to embrace paradoxes and avoid false dichotomies. Consider humane effectiveness, adaptiveness, ambidexterity, and timeliness.

As an executive or board member, do you want to turn the tide? Do you want to be personally associated with something different, something positive, something pattern-oriented, something context-oriented? Do you want to protect your legacy? Do you want better results? 

Do you want to be associated with humane effectiveness, adaptiveness, and timeliness?